Showing posts with label Altar girls. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Altar girls. Show all posts

Friday, August 26, 2011

Ratgirl & Sour Grapes


The so-called periodical "CatholicHerald.co.uk" proclaims the Modernist Heresiarch Joseph Ratzinger's recent molestation of a female altar server (see picture of a ratgirl passing the zuchetto) as being essentially Catholic, and they refuse to anathematize him as Antipope.
A recent but very poorly written article tries to claim one can be a "Catholic" and even "Pope" and have so-called "altar girls" in the Liturgy--while at the same time the author W.O. vomits SOUR GRAPES of "Fr." (?) Z about the mess and the crisis of priestly vocations being directly linked to the Feminist leakage caused by Antipope John Paul II. You cannot have it both ways, either "altar girls" is a Feminist, antimasculine, heretical, schismatial, witchcraftist, and damned innovation of Modernism, or it's essential Catholic! Which is it?



W.O. thinks Modernism is Catholicism, he is surely in error! And further Modernism is not even Protestantism, in fact it is more heretical than Protestantism! So don't term people who attend the Novus Ordo Protestants, call them Modernists! This practice of so-called "altar girls" is not even historically Protestant (though the evolution of many heresies wrought this), i.e. Lutheran, Calvinist, Anglican, etc. according to the original practice of the heretical founders who would of attempted to forbid a woman in an active role of so-called Eucharistic service (so-called "altar girls, female lectors, extrordinary communion ministers", etc.) in a church because they would of acknowledged the Holy Bible's word on the matter albeit according to their false notions of canonization, esp. the Letter of St. Paul the Apostle to the Corinthians. On the contrary, W.O. does even agree with damned-heresiarch Martin Luther and the Protestant heresiarches on the matter, and I dare say that the original Protestants would of attempted to condemn W.O.'s theories in as much it would be offensive to their sentiments (and they would also condemn today's Modernist Protestants for the same Feminist heresy) as claiming to follow unscriptural and openly heretical, gnostic, and witchcraft practices historically condemned by the early Christian Church.
You can read M.O.'s weak sentiments yourself: Warning here is the link to his Modernist mess:
http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/commentandblogs/2011/08/25/the-1994-statement-permitting-girl-servers-was-a-mistaken-tactical-retreat-which-led-to-a-fall-in-priestly-vocations-it’s-time-to-withdraw-it/


THE TRUE POPE OF ROME HIS HOLINESS BENEDICT XV (CHIESA) DECLARED:
Hence arose the monstrous errors of "Modernism," which Our Predecessor rightly declared to be "the synthesis of all heresies," and solemnly condemned. We hereby renew that condemnation in all its fulness, Venerable Brethren, and as the plague is not yet entirely stamped out, but lurks here and there in hidden places, We exhort all to be carefully here and there in hidden places, We exhort all to be carefully on their guard against any contagion of the evil, to which we may apply the words Job used in other circumstances: "It is a fire that devoureth even to destruction, and rooteth up all things that spring" (Job xxxi. 12). Nor do We merely desire that Catholics should shrink from the errors of Modernism, but also from the tendencies or what is called the spirit of Modernism. Those who are infected by that spirit develop a keen dislike for all that savours of antiquity and become eager searchers after novelties in everything: in the way in which they carry out religious functions, in the ruling of Catholic institutions, and even in private exercises of piety. Therefore it is Our will that the law of our forefathers should still be held sacred: "Let there be no innovation; keep to what has been handed down." In matters of faith that must be inviolably adhered to as the law; it may however also serve as a guide even in matters subject to change, but even in such cases the rule would hold: "Old things, but in a new way." (Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum, 1 Nov. 1914, n. 25)

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Fr (?) Z's Ratzi-Motu Mess 3.0 & Altar Girls


Motu-Mess 3.0 Complements of Antipope Benedict XVI

Recently Antipope Benedict XVI renewed his Motu Mess in 3.0 style after asking his wolves to show more respect to his plan to bring the Usage of Antipope John XXIII's 1962 Revised Latin Missal into Rosicrucian hermeneutical line with and practically complementing the Modernist destructions of Annibale Bugnini's Novus DisOrdo Amissae. In fact, on the 8th of May Fr. (?) Z and Damian Thompson reported on the sacrilege of altar girls involving the 1962 Latin Missal at the Fish House in Cambridge University of England thus exemplifying the Pseudo-Traditionalist/Neo-Modernist dilemma "The two complement each other, one is not higher than the other, and they only differ in expressions of the same faith" .

So reads the Z-Report about this abomination :

Dear Fr Zuhlsdorf,

I am sorry to confirm the rumour about the developments at Fisher House in Cambridge. As a result of the decisions to have female servers in the Extraordinary Form all servers who have been helping with the Masses in the Extraordinary Form in Fisher house have resigned; the congregation was much smaller than usual because some of the faithful (like me) decided not to come (and probably also because of lacking information on the Mass schedule, so it was not only out of protest), and some people left during the Mass. As someone who has been deeply involved in the liturgical life of Fisher House … I am very sorry about this development, and I hope that Ecclesia Dei will reply speedily to resolve the matter (I have written to them twice last year, when then chaplain first mooted this idea, but still have not received any official reply). However, I would like to stress that the Fr Alban has been an exemplary chaplain to Cambridge University, ….

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2011/05/tlm-with-female-servers-not-just-a-theory/

Does Fr. (?) Z condemn altar girls as evil? Nope! Therefore he consents to iniquity!

The Holy Catholic Church damns such evil practice of altar girls.

http://laicanetwork.blogspot.com/p/pontifical-catholic-magisterium-against_29.html

Motu-Mess means Apostasy & that's not the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, put that Z in your pipe and smoke it!

Remember!

Liturgical Abuse is Child Abuse

www.laicanetwork.blogspot.com

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Pseudo-Vatican Approved Altar Girls



PSEUDO-VATICAN COMMUNICATION ON FEMALE ALTAR SERVERS
Congregation for Divine Worship
Following is the text of a communication sent from the Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments to the presidents of episcopal conferences permitting altar girls.

Rome, 15 March 1994

Excellence,

It is my duty to communicate to the Presidents of the Episcopal Conferences that an authentic interpretation of Canon 230 #2 of the Code of Canon Law will soon be published in Acta Apostolicae Sedis.

As you know, Canon 230 #2 lays down that:

"Laici ex temporanea deputatione in actionibus liturgicis munus lectoris implere possunt; item omnes laici muneribus commentatoris, cantoris aliisve ad normam iuris fungi possunt."

The Pontifical Council for the interpretation of Legislative Texts was recently asked if the liturgical functions which, according to the above canon, can be entrusted to the lay faithful, may be carried out equally by men and women, and if serving at the altar may be included among those functions, on a par with the others indicated by the canon.

At its meeting of 30 June 1992, the members of the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts examined the following which had been proposed to them:

Utrum inter munera liturgica quibus laici, sive viri sive mulieres, iuxta C.I. C. Can. 230 #2, fungi possunt, adnumerari etiam possit servitium ad altare.

The following response was given: "Affirmative et iuxta instructiones a Sede Apostolica dandas."

Subsequently, at an Audience granted on 11 July 1992 to the Most Reverend Vincenzo Fagiolo, Archbishop Emeritus of Chieti-Vasto and President of the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts, Pope John Paul II confirmed the decision and ordered its promulgation. This will be done in the near future.

In communicating the above information to your Episcopal Conference, I feel obliged to clarify certain aspects of Canon 230 #2 and of its authentic interpretation:

1) Canon 230 #2 has a permissive and not a preceptive character: "Laici . . . possunt." Hence the permission given in this regard by some Bishops can in no way be considered as binding on other Bishops. In fact, it is the competence of each Bishop, in his diocese, after hearing the opinion of the Episcopal Conference, to make a prudential judgment on what to do, with a view to the ordered development of liturgical life in his own diocese.

2) The Holy See respects the decision adopted by certain Bishops for specific local reasons on the basis of the provisions of Canon 230 2. At the same time, however, the Holy See wishes to recall that it will always be very appropriate to follow the noble tradition of having boys serve at the altar. As is well known, this has led to a reassuring development of priestly vocations. Thus the obligation to support such groups of altar boys will always continue.

3) If in some diocese, on the basis of Canon 230 #2, the Bishop permits that, for particular reasons, women may also serve at the altar, this decision must be clearly explained to the faithful, in the light of the above-mentioned norm. It shall also be made clear that the norm is already being widely applied, by the fact that women frequently serve as lectors in the Liturgy and can also be called upon to distribute Holy Communion as Extraordinary Ministers of the Eucharist and to carry out other functions, according to the provisions of the same Canon 230 #3.

4) It must also be clearly understood that the liturgical services mentioned above are carried out by lay people ex temporanea deputatione, according to the judgment of the Bishop, without lay people, be they men or women, having any right to exercise them.

In communicating the above, the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments has sought to carry out the mandate received from the Supreme Pontiff to provide directives to illustrate what is laid down in Canon 230 #2 of the Code of Canon Law and its authentic interpretation, which will shortly be published.

In this way the Bishops will be better able to carry out their mission to be moderators and promoters of liturgical life in their own dioceses, within the framework of the norms in force of the Universal Church.

In deep communion with all the members of your Episcopal Conference. I remain

Yours sincerely in Christ,

Cardinal Antonio Maria Javierre Ortas
Prefect

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Antipope Benedict's altar girls










Antipope Benedict's altar girls

On October 15, 2005, in a ceremony of adoration of the Blessed Sacrament realized at St. Peter's Square, Antipope Benedict XVI admitted girls on the altar. The tradition of the Church, which forbids women on the altar, never made an exception to altar girls.

The constant teaching of the Pontifical Magisterium before the Robber's Council of 1962-1965 is well expressed by the following words of His Holiness Pope Benedict XIV (Lambertini):

"Pope Gelasius in his ninth letter (chap. 26) to the Bishops of Lucania condemned the evil practice which had been introduced of women serving the priest at the celebration of Mass. Since this abuse had spread to the Greeks, Innocent IV strictly forbade it in his letter to the Bishop of Tusculum: 'Women should not dare to serve at the altar; they should be altogether refused this ministry.' We too have forbidden this practice in the same words in Our oft-repeated constitution Etsi Pastoralis, sect. 6, n. 21" (Pope Benedict XIV, Encyclical Allatae Sunt, July 26, 1755, n. 29)

One sees that admitting altar girls is a violation of divine law, schismatic act, and liturgical abuse, which is child abuse! Antipope Benedict XVI is also a warlock because he is promoting witchcraft in the Novus Ordo Sect.

Please pray to stop sacrileges, for Liturgical Abuse is Child Abuse!