A Reply to Paco on Infallibility & Indefectibility of Church Discipline

PACO aka "Ite ad Thomam" Blogger Stated:

http://iteadthomam.blogspot.com/2011/02/disciplinary-infallibility-of-church.html

The Disciplinary Infallibility of the Church: The Novus ordo Missae Cannot be Strictly Heretical
"The prayers prescribed or approved for universal use in public worship cannot be opposed to any revealed truth. Hence the axiom, Lex orandi est lex credendi,--the rule of prayer is the rule of faith."

The following is taken from Sylvester Berry, D.D., The Church of Christ (1927), Ch. XVI: "The Extent of Infallibility," pp. 503-9 (available from the ITOPL collection).


A.M.D.G.
6th. Sunday after Epiphany

Dear Paco:

The Theological Proofs for the Infallibility & Indefectibility of Church Discipline are Affirmed.

On the contrary, the Novus Ordo Amissae is an "abomination of desolation" (Dan. 8:12) because of its heterodox and defective practices concerning general liturgical discipline.

I respond, the evil, heterodox, and schismatical practices of Pseudo-Altar Girls & Female "ministers" such as so-called Eucharistic handlers and Pseudo-Lectors are approved by Pseudo-Vatican Officialdom in the new Code of 1983 in its new inclusive language of persons in ministry and by the curial commission of official interpretation decree and by general discipline and praxis (e.g. Midnight Novus Ordo on Christmas at St Peter's, National Basilicas, and all sorts of notorious events, see proofs at http://laicanetwork.blogspot.com). Please confer the 1994 Modernist Rescript on official approval of Pseudo-Altar Girls & Female Pseudo-Ministers in interpretation of new 1983 Code Canon # 230 which promulgated this false-law of Modernism:

http://laicanetwork.blogspot.com/2011/02/pseudo-vatican-approved-altar-girls.html


Do you recognize this sacrilegious and schismatical abuse is practiced by BENEDICT XVI and his Pseudo-bishops for so many years now as a general discipline? (Or are you unaware of the delicta graviora?)

So either it's sacrilege or not.

If it's a sacrilege, such a Novus Ordo is not the pleasing August Sacrifice of Mass in communion with Orthodox Rome, then that means the Apostolic See is Vacant; or

The gates of hell prevailed.

The latter is impossible (Matthew 16:16-19). So therefore it follows, manifestly Rome is Sede Vacante because the Catholic Church's general discipline is infallible and indefectible, and no gate of hell (i.e. heresiarch) can prevail against Her!

The contrary position is to embrace the Heretical Depravity & Schismatical Sacrileges of Modernism as holy and infallible--but I doubt anyone with common sense and good will would dare to do so? Unfortunately, certain men like Pseudo-Bishop Fernando Arêas Rifan have done so.

http://laicanetwork.blogspot.com/2010/09/public-sacrilege-of-dom-rifan-false.html

The Pontifical Magisterium has condemned the heresy that states that the Catholic Church's Sacred Liturgy of whatever approved Rite can contain impious or heretical elements and practices within its discipline.

http://laicanetwork.blogspot.com/p/pontifical-catholic-magisterium-against_29.html


Catholics must reject all Modernism and Modernists. The Novus Ordo is a Rite of Modernism promulgated and practiced by Modernists on a world-wide scale. Therefore, I reject the synthesis of all heresies in its substance of "Semper Reformata" in Damned Rites, i.e. nova lex orandi Modernismi, nova lex credendi Modernismi, and its abominable heretical, apostate, and schismatical sacrileges that do not communicate in the Divine Mystery, but in profanity and final damnation (Cf. St. Jerome's Letter 15).

REMEMBER!

Liturgical Abuse Is Child Abuse.

http://laicanetwork.blogspot.com/