Antipope Francis I continues the Liturgical Abuse of Modernism

See EWTN's Video: http://youtu.be/10Uj6FRb9-A?t=1h39m13s

Antipope Francis I, following Antipope Benedict XVI's sacrilegious abuse, did nothing to prevent the schismatical sacrilege of a female pretending to have the dignity and office of Lector--a Minor Order of the Priesthood.

In fact the Novus Ordo station EWTN also promoted this witchcraft of Feminism. So let's ask the question: WDTPRS, oh "Fr"(?) Z ? Does the All Holy Truth really promote this? Nope!

Romans hear the words of St. Paul speaking to you as he did to the Corinthians! 

We pray for St. Paul's intercession in order that this schismatical delict cease and that ecclesiastical penalties be pronounced by a true Roman Catholic prelate for Liturgical Abuse Is Child Abuse!

EWTN Airs Donald Wuerl's "Glories" of Liturgical Feminism-Modernism at CUA

“The changes are not substantive, but the Mass is going to sound a little different. I think we simply need to be helping all of our faithful people to get used to and prepare for some of those new sounds.

“In a very short period of time, we’ll become accustomed to them and we’ll simply take it as the normal way in which we celebrate Mass,” he added.

“I encourage every one of our Catholic faithful to use this as a moment now to reflect on what is happening at Mass, what these words signify, what they communicate, and what mystery is being re-presented on the altar.”

Donald Wuerl, January 31, 2011: http://www.ewtnnews.com/catholic-news/US.php?id=2550

Talk about substantial changes ALREADY! On September 1, 2011, Donald Wuerl exsecrably celebrated a New Year of Feminism and Modernism mixed together (non ex Corde Ecclesiae erat) into a Schismatical and Heretical Unhappy Novus Ordo Meal at the Basilica of the Immaculate Conception adjacent to CUA in Washington, D.C., for it was according to the Spirit of Satan that this sacrilege took place, as a matter of fact here's a feminist witch wearing a clerical-academic biretta (what novel abuse) leading in the Novus Ordo parade of Modernist Apostasy at the Basilica as captured in this picture from the EWTN video:

According to "Fr."(?) Z here's a description of the academic biretta for clergy:

My understanding is that the secular/diocesan priest dresses in a house cassock appropriate to his dignity and ferraiolo with biretta. If he is holds a doctorate from a pontifical university, his four-cornered biretta is trimmed with the color of his field (theology-red, philosophy-blue, law-green). It is also possible to have a doctoral ring from Roman institutions, engraved with "Roma". To my knowledge there is no special attire for the Master’s or STL, though I have heard in some places of the three cornered biretta fo the STL on the model of the doctoral biretta. You would use the house cassock, biretta, and ferraiolo.

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2010/05/quaeritur-academic-attire-for-priests/

Hey z-bird tweet @LAICAnetwork- is it licit to have a woman wear an academic-clerical biretta in a liturgical procession inside a Basilica? Hint to scoop: 2+2= 4 is true, 2+2= 5 is false; so smoke that in your z-pipe!

Anyhow, so far no complaining publicized by EWTN's Raymond Arroyo--it must be the Wuerl Over--or something like the New World Order Judaizer-Masonic Meal that keeps him into delicta graviora according to the Spirit of Modernism, so here's the video full of abuses and corruption of the youth which anyone with two eyes or even one eye can see (click link below):

http://publicaffairs.cua.edu/videos/mass-of-the-holy-spirit.cfm

DO PENANCE AND PRAY TO STOP LITURGICAL ABUSES NOW.

REMEMBER!

Liturgical Abuse Is Child Abuse.

http://laicanetwork.blogspot.com/

Fr (?) Z's Ratzi-Motu Mess 3.0 & Altar Girls

Motu-Mess 3.0 Complements of Antipope Benedict XVI

Recently Antipope Benedict XVI renewed his Motu Mess in 3.0 style after asking his wolves to show more respect to his plan to bring the Usage of Antipope John XXIII's 1962 Revised Latin Missal into Rosicrucian hermeneutical line with and practically complementing the Modernist destructions of Annibale Bugnini's Novus DisOrdo Amissae. In fact, on the 8th of May Fr. (?) Z and Damian Thompson reported on the sacrilege of altar girls involving the 1962 Latin Missal at the Fish House in Cambridge University of England thus exemplifying the Pseudo-Traditionalist/Neo-Modernist dilemma "The two complement each other, one is not higher than the other, and they only differ in expressions of the same faith" .

So reads the Z-Report about this abomination :

Dear Fr Zuhlsdorf,

I am sorry to confirm the rumour about the developments at Fisher House in Cambridge. As a result of the decisions to have female servers in the Extraordinary Form all servers who have been helping with the Masses in the Extraordinary Form in Fisher house have resigned; the congregation was much smaller than usual because some of the faithful (like me) decided not to come (and probably also because of lacking information on the Mass schedule, so it was not only out of protest), and some people left during the Mass. As someone who has been deeply involved in the liturgical life of Fisher House … I am very sorry about this development, and I hope that Ecclesia Dei will reply speedily to resolve the matter (I have written to them twice last year, when then chaplain first mooted this idea, but still have not received any official reply). However, I would like to stress that the Fr Alban has been an exemplary chaplain to Cambridge University, ….

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2011/05/tlm-with-female-servers-not-just-a-theory/

Does Fr. (?) Z condemn altar girls as evil? Nope! Therefore he consents to iniquity!

The Holy Catholic Church damns such evil practice of altar girls.

http://laicanetwork.blogspot.com/p/pontifical-catholic-magisterium-against_29.html

Motu-Mess means Apostasy & that's not the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, put that Z in your pipe and smoke it!

Remember!

Liturgical Abuse is Child Abuse

www.laicanetwork.blogspot.com

Pseudo-Vatican Approved Altar Girls

PSEUDO-VATICAN COMMUNICATION ON FEMALE ALTAR SERVERS
Congregation for Divine Worship
Following is the text of a communication sent from the Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments to the presidents of episcopal conferences permitting altar girls.

Rome, 15 March 1994

Excellence,

It is my duty to communicate to the Presidents of the Episcopal Conferences that an authentic interpretation of Canon 230 #2 of the Code of Canon Law will soon be published in Acta Apostolicae Sedis.

As you know, Canon 230 #2 lays down that:

"Laici ex temporanea deputatione in actionibus liturgicis munus lectoris implere possunt; item omnes laici muneribus commentatoris, cantoris aliisve ad normam iuris fungi possunt."

The Pontifical Council for the interpretation of Legislative Texts was recently asked if the liturgical functions which, according to the above canon, can be entrusted to the lay faithful, may be carried out equally by men and women, and if serving at the altar may be included among those functions, on a par with the others indicated by the canon.

At its meeting of 30 June 1992, the members of the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts examined the following which had been proposed to them:

Utrum inter munera liturgica quibus laici, sive viri sive mulieres, iuxta C.I. C. Can. 230 #2, fungi possunt, adnumerari etiam possit servitium ad altare.

The following response was given: "Affirmative et iuxta instructiones a Sede Apostolica dandas."

Subsequently, at an Audience granted on 11 July 1992 to the Most Reverend Vincenzo Fagiolo, Archbishop Emeritus of Chieti-Vasto and President of the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts, Pope John Paul II confirmed the decision and ordered its promulgation. This will be done in the near future.

In communicating the above information to your Episcopal Conference, I feel obliged to clarify certain aspects of Canon 230 #2 and of its authentic interpretation:

1) Canon 230 #2 has a permissive and not a preceptive character: "Laici . . . possunt." Hence the permission given in this regard by some Bishops can in no way be considered as binding on other Bishops. In fact, it is the competence of each Bishop, in his diocese, after hearing the opinion of the Episcopal Conference, to make a prudential judgment on what to do, with a view to the ordered development of liturgical life in his own diocese.

2) The Holy See respects the decision adopted by certain Bishops for specific local reasons on the basis of the provisions of Canon 230 2. At the same time, however, the Holy See wishes to recall that it will always be very appropriate to follow the noble tradition of having boys serve at the altar. As is well known, this has led to a reassuring development of priestly vocations. Thus the obligation to support such groups of altar boys will always continue.

3) If in some diocese, on the basis of Canon 230 #2, the Bishop permits that, for particular reasons, women may also serve at the altar, this decision must be clearly explained to the faithful, in the light of the above-mentioned norm. It shall also be made clear that the norm is already being widely applied, by the fact that women frequently serve as lectors in the Liturgy and can also be called upon to distribute Holy Communion as Extraordinary Ministers of the Eucharist and to carry out other functions, according to the provisions of the same Canon 230 #3.

4) It must also be clearly understood that the liturgical services mentioned above are carried out by lay people ex temporanea deputatione, according to the judgment of the Bishop, without lay people, be they men or women, having any right to exercise them.

In communicating the above, the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments has sought to carry out the mandate received from the Supreme Pontiff to provide directives to illustrate what is laid down in Canon 230 #2 of the Code of Canon Law and its authentic interpretation, which will shortly be published.

In this way the Bishops will be better able to carry out their mission to be moderators and promoters of liturgical life in their own dioceses, within the framework of the norms in force of the Universal Church.

In deep communion with all the members of your Episcopal Conference. I remain

Yours sincerely in Christ,

Cardinal Antonio Maria Javierre Ortas
Prefect

The Antipope & Pseudo-Queen Sacrileged Sagrada Familia

Before God and Man -- and the Cameras -- the "Pseudo-Traditional" Antipope Benedict-Ratzinger

Glad-hands the Cookie to the Pseudo-Queen of Spain

Antipope Benedict-Ratzinger, Who Many Wrongly Think Is a "Traditional Pope"

Is Here Exposed as a Fraudster before God and Man

Gladhanding the Novus Ordo Cookie to the Pseudo-Queen on Spain on November 7, 2010

He Gives the Cookie on the Tongue only on Rare Occasions

When He Wants to Deceive the Motarians and Pseudo-traditionalists

On November 7, 2010, in front of God and man -- and the cameras --, Antipope Benedict-Ratzinger publicly glad-handed the Novus Ordo cookie in the hand to the Pseudo-Queen of Spain at the Sagrada Familia Novus Ordo temple. Even though a kneeler was provided for theatrical effect, the queen never knelt, even for Novus Ordo "communion." Nor did she wear a head covering. All in all, a really "traditional" moment with the Modernist Antipope!

Good Catholics, many Motarians and pseudo-traditionalists are deluded into thinking that Antipope Benedict-Ratzinger is a "traditional pope." Even Bernie Fellay, the SSPX's current false-superior general, seems to embrace this delusion. On the contrary, Antipope Benedict-Ratzinger is a fraudster. He gives the Novus Ordo cookie on the tongue only on rare occasions, when he wants to deceive the Motarians and pseudo-traditionalists.

Please pray for reparation and stop sacrilege for Liturgical Abuse is Child Abuse!

Kyrie-eleison.