Bergoglio Washes Ratzinger's Novus Ordo Reform of the Reform towards greater Modernism

During the evening on Holy Thursday 2013, at a Novus Ordo Bugnini Meal Antipope Francis washed the feet of 12 young people of different nationalities and sects, including at least two Muslims and two women, who are housed at the juvenile detention facility.

(Catholic News Service)

The Secular Media has immediately picked up on Antipope Francis' break with Catholic Tradition for Maundy Thursday Liturgy and the implications of this heretical act towards creating a Novus Ordo female priesthood (maybe these witches will claim to be even greater than their warlock presbyters--i.e. presiders). It was written:

Chris Gillibrand, a British commentator, wrote on his blog, CathCon: "We will see whether it is a particular case, as Lombardi suggests, or the beginning of a journey. Given his active support for the charismatic movement in his diocese, one can only be concerned that he could be prepared to ordain women … How can the pope [sic] maintain discipline in the church if he himself does not conform himself to prevailing ecclesiastical legislation?"

Of course LAICA Network knows the Catholic Tradition has always excluded women during the Mandatum washing, it was reserved only for Catholic men, and the bishop would preferably wash the feet of his own priests in imitation of Christ at the Last Supper washing his Apostles' feet who he ordained to the priesthood. To follow the Lord's pattern is true humility, but to break away from that perfect pattern in order to pretend to oneself that his way is greater than the Lord's way, then that's really the sin of pride. Bergoglio's pride causes him to blind himself and his follower through a cloak of pseudo-humility in order to attempt to sugar coat his crimes before the world, that is the seduction within his delicta graviora that uniquely marks his guilt. He promotes openly the heresies, schisms, and apostasies of Modernism, Witchcraft, and Feminism but through the cloak of false-humility, which any orthodox Catholic will see is really the sin of pride that will only damn him and his abettors.

Cowards like Raymond Arroyo, George Weigel, "Fr."(?) Z, "Fr."(?) Fessio, Shawn Tribe, and other weak Novus Ordo personalities have failed to loudly anathematize and damn Jorge Bergoglio as a heretical Antipope along with all his followers on account of this act of sacrilege during the very day commemorating the Institution of the Holy Eucharist and Sacred Orders--which through Minor and Major Ranks is reserved by Divine Law for men alone! 

This Liturgical Abuse is Child Abuse! How can a archliturgical-abuser claim to be the Vicar of Jesus Christ? And how can anyone but a fool claim that man is true Pope of Rome?

Oddly, the Novus Ordo Sect under Joseph Ratzinger and CDF officialdom even considered the washing of females as tantamount to confirming the claim for woman priests. Here's a summary of Novus Ordo warning made back in 2006 re-iterating Ratzinger's Letter Paschales Solemnitatis of 1988:

Washing of the Feet on Holy Thursday

3/29/2006 - 5:45 AM PST

And More on Days of Abstinence

ROME, MARCH 29, 2006 (Zenit) - Answered by Father Edward McNamara, professor of liturgy at the Regina Apostolorum university. 

Q: I understand that it is in fact liturgically incorrect to have the main celebrant at the Holy Thursday Mass wash the feet of women. Correct? -- J.C., Ballina, Ireland. During the Holy Thursday liturgy at our parish, there are a number of foot-washing stations set up around the Church, and the people in the pews get up and bring someone else to one of the stations and wash their feet. Most of the people in Church take part in this, washing feet and in turn having their feet washed. It takes quite a while. Is this liturgically correct? Are there any norms for foot-washing during the Holy Thursday Mass? -- B.S., Naperville, Illinois. On Holy Thursday, at the washing of feet, the people, mostly youth, after having their foot washed, preceded to wash the next person's foot. Then they placed four bowls of water and four places before the altar, and the congregation was told to come forward and have their hands washed by the same people who just had their foot washed. We didn't. Everything felt out of order. -- E.K., Freehold, New Jersey 

There has been no change in the universal norm which reserves this rite to men as stated in the circular letter "Paschales Solemnitatis" (Jan. 16, 1988) and the rubrics of the 2002 Latin Roman Missal. 

No. 51 of the circular letter states: "The washing of the feet of chosen men which, according to tradition, is performed on this day, represents the service and charity of Christ, who came 'not to be served, but to serve.' This tradition should be maintained, and its proper significance explained." 

About a year ago, however, the Holy See, while affirming that the men-only rule remains the norm, did permit a U.S. bishop to also wash women's feet if he considered it pastorally necessary in specific cases. This permission was for a particular case and from a strictly legal point of view has no value outside the diocese in question. 

I believe that the best option, as "Paschales Solemnitatis" states, is to maintain the tradition and explain its proper significance. 

This means preparing the rite following liturgical law to the letter, explain its meaning as an evocation of Christ's gesture of service and charity to his apostles, and avoid getting embroiled in controversies that try to attribute to the rite meanings it was never meant to have. 

Regarding the place and number of those whose feet are to be washed, the rubric, which has remained unvaried in the new missal, describes the rite as follows: 

"Depending on pastoral circumstances, the washing of feet may follow the homily. 

"The men who have been chosen are led by the ministers to chairs prepared in a suitable place. Then the priest (removing his chasuble if necessary) goes to each man. With the help of the ministers he pours water over each one's feet and dries them." 

The number of men selected for the rite is not fixed. Twelve is the most common option but they may be fewer in order to adjust to the available space. 

Likewise the place chosen is usually within or near the presbytery so that the rite is clearly visible to the assembly. 

Thus, the logical sense of the rubric requires the priest, representing Christ, washing feet of a group of men taken from the assembly, symbolizing the apostles, in a clearly visible area. 

The variations described above -- of washing the feet of the entire congregation, of people washing each other's feet (or hands), or doing so in situations that are not visible to all -- tend to undermine the sense of this rite within the concrete context of the Mass of the Lord's Supper. 

Such practices, by greatly extending the time required, tend to convert a meaningful, but optional, rite into the focal point of the celebration. And that detracts attention from the commemoration of the institution of the Eucharist on Holy Thursday, the principal motive of the celebration. 

In other circumstances, such as retreats or so called para-liturgical services, it can be perfectly legitimate to perform foot-washing rites inspired by Christ's example and by the liturgy. In such cases none of the limitations imposed by the concrete liturgical context of the Holy Thursday Mass need apply. 

* * * 

http://www.catholic.org/featured/headline.php?ID=3155



Here's the traditional Catholic Mandatum ceremony out of the Missale Romanum as decred by Council of Trent and executed into publication by Pope St. Pius V:

Only a fool wouldn't think the man who said "Ecclesia semper reformanda" couldn't be a Modernist prepared to accept any novelties evolved out of the living germ of Modernism, that is through the development of doctrine. Antipope Benedict XVI realized it was time for #Change, hence the next step of Modernism and its development of heresy manifestly is taking effect. That was always the plan for the Novus Ordo's Reform of the Reform, meaning perpetual Modernism, keeping the Novus Ordo always "New" always changing to so-called social progress and evening mixing it up with some elements of the old Liturgy in order to try to pervert things together even at the seemingly minimal degree of contamination. So Bergoglio has simply "washed" Ratzinger's Novus Ordo Reform of the Reform towards greater crimes of Modernism even if its contaminated with dirty water there will be Motu-Modernists who'll drink from that "kool-aid" bowl.

Of course the sacrileges of Modernism is nothing new to Antipope Bergoglio's careerism of heresy, to know this, you only have to ask Argentina why she cries so much?

 Jorge Bergoglio giving Novus Ordo Communion to the crowds in Buenos Aires. The pseudo-cardinal is handing out hosts on August 7, 2004, at the Novus Ordo Mess on the feast day of St. Cajetan at the Sanctuary of St. Cajetan in the neighborhood of Liniers.

Sources (Caveat: We do not endorse these web pages):

http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-official-end-of-reform-of-reform-by.html

http://traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A514-Communion.htm

http://clericalwhispers.blogspot.com/2013/03/pope-francis-papal-feet-washing-sparks_29.html

Please pray for the end of Liturgical Abuse, because it's Child Abuse.

Chaput's Installation of Singing Canwitch as Chori Pseudoepiscopus

Charles Chaput's Installation of Singing Canwitch as Chori Pseudoepiscopus is part of his plan for 'Renew This Great Church' of Modernism which took place on Sept. 8, 2001 at the Cathedral Basilica of Saints Peter and Paul in Philadelphia, PA (and was aired live on EWTN).

What's a chori episcopus? A Catholic Dictionary by William Edward Addis defines it as:

So what is a woman acting as a choir bishop or cantor (which is a minor order in the Eastern Church)? Well Chaput announced his commitment to the Renewal of the "failed church" of Sean O'Malley who was present at the abomination, and who is quoted to say recently about Child Abuse:

"Having met with hundreds of survivors, I know firsthand the scars you carry," he said. "And I carry with me every day the pain of the church's failures. I express once again my sorrow for your pain and my apology for any way the church and its clergy have failed you."

http://www.salemnews.com/local/x975851535/40-North-Shore-priests-on-abuse-list

http://www.bostoncatholic.org/publication.aspx

http://laicanetwork.blogspot.com/2011/09/failed-church-of-sean-omalley.html

"Fr."(?) Z picked up on this common unbelief when he commented on the Installation ceremony (not mentioning the canwitch) but quoting the pseudobishop himself who continues O'Malley's sentiments about Child Abuse and a falied church:

"This Church in Philadelphia faces very serious challenges these days. There’s no quick fix to problems that are so difficult, and none of us here today, except the Lord Himself, is a miracle worker. But it’s important to remember and to believe the Church is not defined by her failures. And you and I are not defined by our critics or by those who dislike us. What we do in the coming months and years to respond to these challenges – that will define who we really are. And in engaging that work, we need to be Catholics first, and always. Jesus Christ is the center of our lives, and the Church is our mother and teacher. Everything we do should flow from that."

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2011/09/the-church-is-not-defined-by-her-failures-and-you-and-i-are-not-defined-by-our-critics/

So, Z since when can "the Church Mother and Teacher" fail at anything? The Holy Catholic Church is Immaculate and Indefectible. To say the contrary is to deny the dogma of Ecclesial Indefectibility, which not a few have done in regards to the Church's Sacred Liturgy.

Of course a witchcan is most evil, impious, schismatical, heretical, and abominable apostate, therefore the sacrilege manifests a certain beastly mark of defectibility in the Modernist sect's ugly constitution, but remember this whore of Babylon is NOT the Catholic Church, but rather it's the antichurch full of the mystery of iniquity. As all Catholics realize, the liturgical abuse of women trying to usurp the place in the liturgical choir or cantor has been always condemned because they are not allowed to sing in the church during public worship according to divine command (Cf. Saint Paul Speaks), and most notably the Holy Father Pope Saint Pius X taught this dogma:

"On the same principle it follows that singers in church have a real liturgical office, and that therefore women, being incapable of exercising such office, cannot be admitted to form part of the choir. Whenever, then, it is desired to employ the acute voices of sopranos and contraltos, these parts must be taken by boys, according to the most ancient usage of the Church.

Finally, only men of known piety and probity of life are to be admitted to form part of the choir of a church, and these men should by their modest and devout bearing during the liturgical functions show that they are worthy of the holy office they exercise. It will also be fitting that singers while singing in church wear the ecclesiastical habit and surplice, and that they be hidden behind gratings when the choir is excessively open to the public gaze."(Tra le Sollecitudini, Instruction on Sacred Music, Motu Proprio promulgated on November 22, 1903)

http://laicanetwork.blogspot.com/p/magisterium-of-pope-st-pius-x-on-sacred.html

In the final analysis, this "failed church" of Modernism continues to abuse children by Liturgical Abuse, etc. to bring forth the total loss of salvation for millions of souls.

Remember, please pray Catholic prayer to stop Liturgical Abuse which is Child Abuse!

Ratgirl & Sour Grapes

The so-called periodical "CatholicHerald.co.uk" proclaims the Modernist Heresiarch Joseph Ratzinger's recent molestation of a female altar server (see picture of a ratgirl passing the zuchetto) as being essentially Catholic, and they refuse to anathematize him as Antipope.

A recent but very poorly written article tries to claim one can be a "Catholic" and even "Pope" and have so-called "altar girls" in the Liturgy--while at the same time the author W.O. vomits SOUR GRAPES of "Fr." (?) Z about the mess and the crisis of priestly vocations being directly linked to the Feminist leakage caused by Antipope John Paul II. You cannot have it both ways, either "altar girls" is a Feminist, antimasculine, heretical, schismatial, witchcraftist, and damned innovation of Modernism, or it's essential Catholic! Which is it?

W.O. thinks Modernism is Catholicism, he is surely in error! And further Modernism is not even Protestantism, in fact it is more heretical than Protestantism! So don't term people who attend the Novus Ordo Protestants, call them Modernists! This practice of so-called "altar girls" is not even historically Protestant (though the evolution of many heresies wrought this), i.e. Lutheran, Calvinist, Anglican, etc. according to the original practice of the heretical founders who would of attempted to forbid a woman in an active role of so-called Eucharistic service (so-called "altar girls, female lectors, extrordinary communion ministers", etc.) in a church because they would of acknowledged the Holy Bible's word on the matter albeit according to their false notions of canonization, esp. the Letter of St. Paul the Apostle to the Corinthians. On the contrary, W.O. does even agree with damned-heresiarch Martin Luther and the Protestant heresiarches on the matter, and I dare say that the original Protestants would of attempted to condemn W.O.'s theories in as much it would be offensive to their sentiments (and they would also condemn today's Modernist Protestants for the same Feminist heresy) as claiming to follow unscriptural and openly heretical, gnostic, and witchcraft practices historically condemned by the early Christian Church.
You can read M.O.'s weak sentiments yourself: Warning here is the link to his Modernist mess:
http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/commentandblogs/2011/08/25/the-1994-statement-permitting-girl-servers-was-a-mistaken-tactical-retreat-which-led-to-a-fall-in-priestly-vocations-it’s-time-to-withdraw-it/

THE TRUE POPE OF ROME HIS HOLINESS BENEDICT XV (CHIESA) DECLARED:

Hence arose the monstrous errors of "Modernism," which Our Predecessor rightly declared to be "the synthesis of all heresies," and solemnly condemned. We hereby renew that condemnation in all its fulness, Venerable Brethren, and as the plague is not yet entirely stamped out, but lurks here and there in hidden places, We exhort all to be carefully here and there in hidden places, We exhort all to be carefully on their guard against any contagion of the evil, to which we may apply the words Job used in other circumstances: "It is a fire that devoureth even to destruction, and rooteth up all things that spring" (Job xxxi. 12). Nor do We merely desire that Catholics should shrink from the errors of Modernism, but also from the tendencies or what is called the spirit of Modernism. Those who are infected by that spirit develop a keen dislike for all that savours of antiquity and become eager searchers after novelties in everything: in the way in which they carry out religious functions, in the ruling of Catholic institutions, and even in private exercises of piety. Therefore it is Our will that the law of our forefathers should still be held sacred: "Let there be no innovation; keep to what has been handed down." In matters of faith that must be inviolably adhered to as the law; it may however also serve as a guide even in matters subject to change, but even in such cases the rule would hold: "Old things, but in a new way." (Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum, 1 Nov. 1914, n. 25)

The Wuerl Over: Latin Pontifical Liturgy Cancelled at Immaculate Conception Basilica

Blackmass presider Donald Wuerl and his National-Modernist Rector Walter R. Rossi (See BlackMass of Damned Soul Martin Luther King Jr. : http://laicanetwork.blogspot.com/2011/01/blackmass-of-damned-soul-martin-luther.html ) decided to cancel any Solemn Pontifical Latin Mass event scheduled by the Paulus Institute for April 9th, 2011 after being heavily criticized by various Traditionalists and being featured here at LAICA. Paul King's Paulus Institute claimed: "We deeply regret this turn of events. We are very disappointed, well aware that thousands of Catholics throughout the United States have made plans to attend. Countless others around the world would have watched and prayed with the EWTN broadcast and wanted the DVD."

http://www.thepaulusinstitute.org/Press%20Releases/3-09-2011.htm


The invited celebrant Augustine DiNoia decided to cancel his celebration of "the sixth anniversary" of the Antipope Benedict XVI because of Judeo-Masonic insensitivities to the rite of passage: "a result of changed circumstances....unable to obtain the necessary permission..." Now that's a timewarp of 1.8 microseconds: just ask Martin Estevez-Sheen, Emilio Estevez-Sheen, and The Dishonest Abe-Apostate Foxmaniac about the twitter fiasco involving Charlie Estevez-Sheen and CBS' Hammie Levine, especially after "Uncle Joe" Ratzinger's newest public rejection of Roman Catholic dogma concerning the Salvific Mission of the Catholic Church to convert all Jews, Jewish perfidy in the murder of Jesus, and also concerning no salvation for Jews outside the Church and without absolute subjection to the Roman Pontiff, etc. --all to the contrary was condemned by the Ecumenical Council of Florence under Eugenius IV the Pope of Christian Unity. Talk about timing! There was too many heresies and contradictions of time and place that it all confused all involved to have no reason to celebrate a confused state of affairs (i.e. Celebration of Latin Mass of St. Pius V versus Celebration of Judaizing?), cf. John L. Allen's article on Jesus of Nazareth Second Volume called "Church should not pursue conversion of Jews...":

http://ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/church-should-not-pursue-conversion-jews-pope-says

DiNoia, as you may recall, was featured on the documentary "Secret Files of the Inquisition," and here's a clip with a Latin Liturgy vignette:




The Wuerl Over with Raymond Arroyo has received neither confirmation nor denial of a Communist Conspiracy involved from NWO-Family Analyst Mr. George Weigel, but there's a novus ordo world over on watch, just consider the Wojtylista-Slav "Fr." (?) Z's blog to count comments:

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2011/03/pontifical-tlm-in-washington-dc-cancelled-unable-to-obtain-the-necessary-permission/

An Altar-girl Carries the Processional Cross At Antipope Benedict-Ratzinger's Mess to Dishonor Cardinal Newman

An Altar-girl Carries the Processional Cross

At Antipope Benedict-Ratzinger's Mess of

Novus Ordo Pseudo-Beatification of Cardinal Newman

Benedict-Ratzinger Frequently Uses Altar-girls at His Messes

Although He Falsely Poses as a So-Called "Traditionalist" when It Suits

His Purpose To Garner Pew-warmers and Money for His New Order

An altar-girl prominently carries with the pontifical processional cross ahead of Antipope Benedict-Ratzinger before his Mess Novus Ordo-beatifying invalidly John Henry Cardinal Newman at Cofton Park in Birmingham, England, September 19, 2010. The Mess drew about half the number expected, far fewer than 40,000. Newdioceses in Britain couldn't sell the tickets and returned many to Newvatican. Some Newchurchers felt cheated and demanded their money back from Newvatican.

It's Not All For You! You can view with discretion this abomination of Modernism via BCTV:

http://www.catholictv.com/shows/default.aspx?videoID=1612

What would Cardinal Newman Do?

Cardinal Newman, of course, who was truly traditional, never used altar-girls and would have considered Benedict-Ratzinger an unCatholic antipope to reject Catholic Sacramental theology in this way, as he wrote about Arianism so it applies today to Neo-Arianism, that is, Modernism has engulfed the Apostasy of most clergy and even an antipope has usurped the Vatican, as Cardinal Newman and his disciple Fr. Henry Ryder wrote:

JOHN HENRY CARDINAL NEWMAN (1801-1890)

"It is not a little remarkable that, though historically speaking
the fourth century is the age of the doctors, illustrated as it is, by
the Saints Athanasius, Hilary, the two Gregories, Basil, Chrysostom,
Ambrose, Jerome, and Augustine (and all those saints bishops also,
except one, nevertheless in that very day the divine tradition committed
to the infallible Church was proclaimed and maintained far more by the
faithful than by the episcopate....
"I mean still, that in that time of immense confusion the divine
dogma of Our Lord's divinity was proclaimed, enforced, maintained, and
(humanly speaking) preserved, far more by the Ecclesia docta ("the
taught Church" -- the faithful) than by the Ecclesia docens ("the
teaching Church" -- the Magisterium); that the body of the Episcopate
was unfaithful to its commission, while the body of the laity was
faithful to its baptism....
"On the one hand, then, I say that there was a temporary
suspension of the functions of the Ecclesia docens. The body of bishops
failed in their confession of the faith. There was weakness, fear of
consequences, misguidance, delusion ... extending itself into nearly
every corner of the Catholic Church. (The Arians of the Fourth Century,
1833)

FR. HENRY IGNATIUS DUDLEY RYDER (1837-1907)
THEOLOGIAN AND SUPERIOR OF THE BIRMINGHAM ORATORY
SUCCESSOR AND STUDENT OF JOHN HENRY CARDINAL NEWMAN

"It has always been maintained by Catholic theologians that for
heresy the Church may judge the Pope, because, as most maintain, by
heresy he ceases to be Pope. There is no variance on this head amongst
theologians that I know of, except that some, with Turrecremata and
Bellarmine, hold tha by heresy he ipso facto ceases to be Pope: whilst
others, with Cajetan and John of St. Thomas, maintain that he would not
formally [as opposed to materially] cease to be Pope until he was
formally deposed.

"The privilege of infallible teaching belongs only to an undoubted
Pope; and on the claims of a doubtful, disputed Pope the Church has the
right of judging. No single example can be produced of a Pope whose
orthodoxy and succession ws undoubted upon whom the Church pretended to
sit in judgment.... During a contested Papacy the state of things
approximates to that of an interregnum. The exercise of active
infallability is suspended." (Catholic Controversy, 6th ed., Burns &
Oates, pp. 30-31)

Catholics must know the Faith about the Sacred Liturgy (Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi), please confer the page "The Pontifical Catholic Magisterium Against Liturgical Abuses & Sacrileges" for more information.

http://laicanetwork.blogspot.com/p/pontifical-catholic-magisterium-against_29.html

Please pray to stop this sacrilege for Liturgical Abuse is Child Abuse!

http://laicanetwork.blogspot.com/p/act-of-reparation-to-holy-trinity.html

It's Not All For You! Irreverend James DiPerri abused "altar girls" on BCTV

Mortal Sin of Sacrilege - No, Dear Catholics - It's Not All For You!

On the Feast of Saint Wenceslaus, that is Tuesday, September 28th of 2010, a Modernist Sacrilege was celebrated by the Irreverend James DiPerri, who claimed to be from Our Lady Comforter of the Afflicted Parish in North Waltham, MA.

You will see two so-called female altar-boys (Katie & Sarah) usurping God's altar in violation of Sacred Tradition. This DiPerri is guilty of public sacrilege of schism and molestation of children.

You can see for free the entire on-demand video of this Novus Ordo abomination streaming online via BCTV (Viewer Discretion is Advised):

http://www.catholictv.com/Saint-Wenceslaus-Saint-Lawrence-Ruiz.aspx

Please note the Pseudo-Director of BCTV - Irreverend Robert Reed - can be contacted in order to snap protest against such offensive acts of delicta graviora:

CatholicTV

Attn: Robert Reed
PO Box 9196
34 Chestnut Street
Watertown MA 02471
617-923-0220

Catholics must know the Faith about the Sacred Liturgy, please confer the page "The Pontifical Catholic Magisterium Against Liturgical Abuses & Sacrileges" for more information.

Please pray to stop this sacrilege for Liturgical Abuse is Child Abuse!

A Hypocritical Benedict-Ratzinger Embraces a Priestess

Benedict-Ratzinger Embraces an Anglican Priestess
He Claims to Uphold the Catholic Doctrine against Priestesses
But on This Occasion He Eagerly Embraced the Heresy
Is He Hypocritically Flipflopping to the Novus Ordo Side on this Doctrine
As He Has Already Done on So Many Others?

Supposedly Antipope Benedict-Ratzinger upholds the Biblical and Catholic doctrine that woman cannot be priests. Really? Even the usually-clueless Motarians and Newchurchers out there cannot fail to see the hypocrisy in this one. Benedict-Ratzinger, falsely portrayed in some circles as a "traditional" pope, on September 17, 2010, became the first antipope in history to embrace a priestess.

He performed this "act of love" with Jane Hedges, the canon-steward of Westminster Abbey during an hour-long "oecumenical" service at the abbey. Such "oecumenical" services are traditionally condemned in Catholic doctrine. Participating also was the heretical Pseudo-Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, an outspoken advocate for priestesses and bishopesses. The summer 2010 Anglican General Synod moved closer to imposing bishopesses on all national churches within the Anglican communion, whether they like it or not. Many have not, and have gone independent from Williams.

Benedict-Ratzinger was also the first ANTIPOPE to enter the heretical abbey, which was stolen from the Catholic Church by the head of the Anglican sect at the time, King Henry VIII of England. Benedict-Ratzinger joined the heretics in procession as he processed up the aisle of the abbey. The heretical pseudo-archbishop wore his mitre, whereas the antipope wore only a stole as they proceeded side by side through the nave. Benedict-Ratzinger had changed out of the faux Novus Ordo stole that had caused so much scandal. It was blue, not a liturgical color, and was inscribed with the outline of large hearts. It looked like the faux stoles that the more liberalist Protestant ministers now wear. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the UK Daily Telegraph.]

We pray to St. Thomas More that all Catholics shun such false worship and wolves in sheep's clothing.

President Francis George Goes to Washington to Commit Grand Sacrilege in Our Lady's Basilica

Pseudo-Cardinal and Conciliarist President Francis George went to Immaculate Conception Basilica to preside with ALL THE US PSEUDOBISHOPS over an abominable sacrilege for the centennial liturgy of Catholic Charities USA which was broadcasted via EWTN on September 25th, 2010. During the sacrilege, females (dressed like whores) simulated the ministry of lector and deacon. Further, a women on the altar dressed in a very immodest mini-skirt received communion in the hand from George himself. One feminist grab the host on her finger tips as if she was a consecrated priestess. Throughout the irreverent service liturgical abuse was displayed everywhere. We even heard a disregard for the prohibition on piano as liturgical music. All in all this service is ignorance of Pope Benedict XIV's decrees on Sacred Music and male only Ecclesiastical Ministry in Sacred Liturgy.

Anathema to Francis George for his Presidency of Sacrilege!

Anathema to all Pseudobishops and false-clergy who joined this Schism!

Anathema to Mother Angelica's Sect for broadcasting it!

Anyone who has video clips, pictures, or other commentaries to share, please feel free to leave a comment.

Please pray for reparation and stop sacrilege for Liturgical Abuse is Child Abuse!

Kyrie-eleison.

Liturgical Abuse Is Child Abuse (LAICA).

Liturgical Abuse Is Child Abuse or LAICA (Latin--Abusia Liturgicalis Liberi Abusia Est) is a Catholic Network to defend the purity of rubrics and rites of the Sacrosanct Catholic Liturgy against the wicked destruction of innovators and invaders who molest and corrupt the lay youth of today (saecula laica) by means of schismatic creativity, heretical depravity of cult, and impure immorality contained within a unstable praxis that exists as the unorthodox Novus Ordo Modernist Sacrilege.

LAICA wishes to demonstrate by ecclesiastical documents and decrees of the Apostolic See how to obey the legitimate prescriptions of liturgical rites, while also supplying updated evidence of the manifest delicta graviora of abuse to warn the faithful to shun and publicly report such clerical abuse in order to protect themselves, their children, and others from such pseudo-clergy and their wicked abomination unto desolation.

LAICA invites you to actively participate in this blog forum and network with your friends so that the information can be shared on an universal scale, while at the same time participants should take the opportunity to share documents and evidence in form of video, pictures, links, and descriptions about such matters so all can be ready to defend the Catholic Faith against all such impieties by exposing the damned sacrileges and all those who are responsible. We wish by God's grace to be an instrument of healing, peace, and strength for all lay people of today who have been sacrilegiously abused and even outright abandoned by wolves in sheep's clothing.

We with the solid union of the Holy Roman Church strongly warn those who innovate in the rites and rubrics of sacraments and liturgies are committing acts of liturgical abuse which is to be in the state of damnation and anathema, regardless of what rank or status they claim, and they will depart to eternal hell, unless they shall convert to the Orthodox Faith and Morals of the Catholic Church. We earnestly pray for God's Mercy that those who have committed such grave sins against the Holy Mysteries will acknowledge and abjure their error, do penance, and make full amends to all affected as the Holy Mother Church so commands.

http://LAICAnetwork.blogspot.com/